arndis: (Default)
Recently I have been working on my website, trying to convert it to PmWiki2 and bring it up to snuff, so that I have something nice to show off to potential employers. In the process, I found that the Nethack spoilers (a 150+ page Word document) are broken. All is not lost, because Word can open it with the repair option, but I'll still have to reformat it, because I've lost the nethack.dot file that held a lot of the styles used. Now I have to waste a lot of time fixing this, or drop this piece from my portfolio, which I really don't want to do, because it's my only book-length project.

Writing standards-compliant XHTML and CSS has taught me to write documents in a way that separates structure and presentation. And here I have this gigantic Word document to deal with, which doesn't. The web standards approach is opposite to Word's: Word is a giant toolkit for making your documents look the way you want them to. Structure is handled entirely in presentation! If I use "clear formatting" on a heading, it turns back into body text. Word's approach only works for short documents, probably less than 3 pages. More than that, and inconsistency will occur despite the best of intentions. Even if you use Word's Styles features, sooner or later you're going to slip, and that bit of ordinary-looking text is really Something Else with its distinctive presentation altered. Another type of lock-in.

So here I am with this huge document, where what I really want to do is rewrite the stylesheet...but I can't, because this is Word, not HTML. If I "clear formatting", I also "clear semantics and structure". Not what I want. I'm trying to figure out how best to deal with this, and I think I'm going to turn it into a Wiki. That will allow for the kind of structure and linking that I want, and I'll probably be able to work out decent presentation. Maybe I'll even be able to give away the project to the Nethack community so that my work won't go to waste, but (hopefully) I won't have to host or maintain it.

Maybe I should start putting everything that isn't a complex creation into a wiki. That still leaves the problem of finding a better text/thought processor for the complex creations. What I want:

  • single-source, multiple-output documents: export to .doc, .rtf, .html, .txt, .pdf, or more as required, with as little loss of structure and presentation as possible in the output medium.

  • able to format for print, screen, or both, preferably with little fuss.

  • encourages me to add structure and semantics to documents.

  • separates structure from presentation.

  • allows me to control presentation tightly if I so choose, by creating my own stylesheets, and supports this in the UI.

  • stored in an open format so that my data is not locked in forever.

  • not overly difficult to learn. I'm willing to invest time in this, but it should not take days of dedicated work to get the basics.

  • doesn't make my document any more complicated than necessary.

  • runs quickly and stably -- preferably on WinXP, or Cygwin-with-X if necessary. (Buying a Mac just isn't in the cards right now.)


Any recommendations?
arndis: (Default)
Keep an eye on Guild Wars and Tabula Rasa, both by NCSoft, which got most of the good staff from Blizzard.

Guild Wars appears to be a sword-and-sorcery hack-n-slash MMO which gets it right. E.g.:

  • no more "I'm on server X and Joe's on server Y so we can't talk to eachother"

  • rapid transit to places you've already been

  • an inventory system that's only half-crippled when compared to Nethack -- this is a huge advance since everything else I've seen has been completely crippled compared to Nethack.

  • private quest areas: no more jerks camping or killstealing unless you brought them with you

  • more control over whether you'll do player vs. player

  • quests scaled for individuals, teams, and larger groups

  • bloody good interaction design, such as being able to draw strategy on the minimap for allies to see (but not foes)

  • no monthly fees -- you pay for the software only


The preorder kit to get a beta tester key and bonus stuff is roughly $10 if my memory of the price at Futureshop is right. I wonder if it's possible to buy one preorder kit and pass it around the group so that we can all try it out. Would someone like one as a Christmas or birthday gift so that we can find out?

Tabula Rasa looks like it will be more innovative, but it's not as far ahead in the development cycle. I think long-term that it would be niftier, and there's hints that it will have many of the same "learned from mistakes" features. No mention of payment model or whatnot, because it's clearly just barely in testing if that.

Profile

arndis: (Default)
Bronwyn Boltwood

September 2010

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 02:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios